Simeon Terziev vs Kaan Cepel Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Terziev 1 - 0 Cepel

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Terziev has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cepel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Terziev, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cepel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Terziev has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cepel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Terziev has won 60% of matches played (W/L 6/ 4), with Cepel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Terziev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 20/ 23). Cepel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 8/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
• Player level: In the last year, Terziev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Cepel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Terziev winning 1 times and Cepel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Terziev winning 2 and Cepel winning 0. The last match between Terziev and Cepel was at the M15 Antalya, 03-01-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Simeon Terziev getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Terziev and Cepel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Terziev winning 0 times and Cepel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Terziev winning 0, and Cepel 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Terziev has played against opponents with an average rank of 51.4 while Cepel has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Terziev has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cepel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Terziev has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cepel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)